Show Summary Details

p. 252. Legal positivismlocked

  • Raymond Wacks

Abstract

‘Legal positivism’ examines classical legal positivism as espoused by its two great protagonists, Jeremy Bentham and John Austin, as well as the approaches of modern legal positivists, including H. L. A. Hart and Joseph Raz, to the concept of law. The claim of natural lawyers that law consists of a series of propositions derived from nature through a process of reasoning is strongly contested by legal positivists. The core of legal positivism is the view that the validity of any law can be traced to an objectively verifiable source. Legal positivism rejects the view — held by natural lawyers — that law exists independently from human enactment.

Access to the complete content on Very Short Introductions online requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter without a subscription.

Please subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code.

For questions on access or troubleshooting, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.