Show Summary Details

p. 593. Three critics of conscience: Dostoevsky, Nietzsche, Freudlocked

  • Paul Strohm

Abstract

Many religious thinkers of the 18th and 19th centuries promulgated a hopeful view of an accessible and socially beneficial conscience. This overly optimistic view of conscience as a source of moral security attracted critics. Dostoevsky, Nietzsche, and Freud were united in their disdain for conscience as an unproblematic agent of self-improvement or an unbending advocate of public morality. All three raised questions: what if conscience, rather than the voice of God or enlightened social consensus, presents an unnecessary burden? What if the burden is unnecessarily imposed upon ourselves? What if we accept and internalize the dictates of external forces that are overbearing or untrue, thus yielding to a conscience of prejudice or unexamined inhibition?

Access to the complete content on Very Short Introductions online requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter without a subscription.

Please subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code.

For questions on access or troubleshooting, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.