Show Summary Details

p. 403. Is agnosticism necessary?locked

  • Robin Le Poidevin

Abstract

‘Is agnosticism necessary?’ examines the responses of agnosticism to atheism. Atheism does not require a defence, rather it is up to theists to convince us that there is a God. If there is room for doubt, then atheism is the rational choice: this is the presumption of atheism — it is the negative position. The arguments against this view are set out. There should be no presumption of atheism, and indeed no presumption of theism either: the initial position should be an agnostic one. Agnosticism is not redundant, but does rest on the relatively weak point that we cannot prove God does or does not exist.

Access to the complete content on Very Short Introductions online requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter without a subscription.

Please subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code.

For questions on access or troubleshooting, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.