Show Summary Details

p. 909. Can there be objectivity in ethics?locked

  • Stephen Gaukroger

Abstract

Is objectivity an appropriate way to think about morality? What role could impartiality or freedom from bias play in moral reasoning? ‘Can there be objectivity in ethics?’ discusses notions closely associated with morality — such as universalisability, justice, and feelings of obligation and guilt — by considering religious thought and the work of Baron de Montesquieu, Samuel Clarke, Immanuel Kant, and John Rawls. Each of these notions can be fleshed out, if only with varying degrees of success, in objective terms. Morality itself, assuming there is some core notion of morality that goes beyond these, seems to resist such treatment.

Access to the complete content on Very Short Introductions online requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter without a subscription.

Please subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code.

For questions on access or troubleshooting, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.